Archive for September 11th, 2009

Winning Tactics in Online Dating

Friday, September 11th, 2009

Lady Luck in all her gloryOkay so I’ll lay it to you straight, the following article is completely ripped off from Mashable, but hey, it’s a great article and the author gets credit. No harm no foul, right? I’ll pass the buck to @WishYouWere for putting ideas in Lady Luck’s head via Twitter. Speaking of Twitter you can follow us over there @ladylucksdating if you feel so inclined.

Okay, now I’m absolved of all blame, and may rest easy in my bed, here it is – graphs and all.

“Online dating: most of you probably have a spruced-up profile on some random dating site, even if you won’t admit it to others. You’ve probably sent a message to someone or maybe even received a few messages yourself. However, most of the time, there is no response.

Actually, there is a response to online dating messages only about 32% of the time, according to the very popular (and free) dating website OkCupid. The company revealed this stat and far more on its OkTrends blog.

In their post, they analyzed the millions of messages that go through OkCupid and were able to discern some very interesting trends. So if you want to get the upper hand when it comes to online dating, or are just curious about the statistics, keep reading.

Should You Write a Short or a Long Message?

You start clicking through profiles. Then suddenly, you stop … because you can’t take your eyes away.  Pretty eyes, a great smile, and this person’s a social media nerd to boot (just go with me on this…). So you click “send message” and are immediately stumped about what you should write. Should you write a long, eloquent message that details why you two would be a match, or fire off a quick message that will spark a deeper conversation?

This is essentially the question that OkCupid explores with their statistics. First, some interesting stats from their website:

- 16% of all first messages are over 2000 characters, or about 400 words.
- First messages sent by guys are only half as likely to get a reply as ones sent from women.
- The average first message is 743 characters long.

However, that doesn’t answer the question of whether a longer message increases your chance of a reply. So they made a very cool graph that shows how often women reply to a man’s message and how often the man responds back:

Summary: Longer messages will increase your chances of getting a response, from about 22% to nearly 35%. So you should write longer messages, right? Wrong, says OkCupid. Their rationale is that, while that long messages will get more responses, you’re not going to be able to send as many.

They estimate that if you can only send three messages of 3000 characters in an hour, resulting in 0.71 conversations (a response and then a response from the original sender) per hour. However, if your messages were 200 characters each, you could send 10 messages and get about 1.71 conversations per hour, more than doubling your chances of finding the one. Of course, if you’re focused on just one girl, and only one, write a very lengthy message.

For girls contacting guys, it’s actually a bit different of a graph:

The shorter the message, the better. Period. You can write about 11.4 messages per hour if they’re 50 characters. This will give you 3.43 conversations per hour. So yes, in both instances, you want to write shorter messages for the best chance of success.

Now exactly what you should write … well, that’s a subject for another blog post, although you should use “pretty” over “beautiful,” use proper English, and say “zombie” in your messages. Yes, I am serious, though I can’t figure out in what context that would work in the first place.”

by Ben Parr

http://mashable.com/2009/09/03/online-dating-responses/

Online dating: most of you probably have a spruced-up profile on some random dating site, even if you won’t

admit it to others. You’ve probably sent a message to someone or maybe even received a few messages

yourself. However, most of the time, there is no response.

Actually, there is a response to online dating messages only about 32% of the time, according to the very

popular (and free) dating website OkCupid. The company revealed this stat and far more on its OkTrends

blog.

In their post, they analyzed the millions of messages that go through OkCupid and were able to discern some

very interesting trends. So if you want to get the upper hand when it comes to online dating, or are just

curious about the statistics, keep reading.
Should You Write a Short or a Long Message?

You start clicking through profiles. Then suddenly, you stop … because you can’t take your eyes away.

Pretty eyes, a great smile, and this person’s a social media nerd to boot (just go with me on this…). So

you click “send message” and are immediately stumped about what you should write. Should you write a long,

eloquent message that details why you two would be a match, or fire off a quick message that will spark a

deeper conversation?

This is essentially the question that OkCupid explores with their statistics. First, some interesting stats

from their website:

- 16% of all first messages are over 2000 characters, or about 400 words.
- First messages sent by guys are only half as likely to get a reply as ones sent from women.
- The average first message is 743 characters long.

However, that doesn’t answer the question of whether a longer message increases your chance of a reply. So

they made a very cool graph that shows how often women reply to a man’s message and how often the man

responds back:

Summary: Longer messages will increase your chances of getting a response, from about 22% to nearly 35%. So

you should write longer messages, right? Wrong, says OkCupid. Their rationale is that, while that long

messages will get more responses, you’re not going to be able to send as many.

They estimate that if you can only send three messages of 3000 characters in an hour, resulting in 0.71

conversations (a response and then a response from the original sender) per hour. However, if your messages

were 200 characters each, you could send 10 messages and get about 1.71 conversations per hour, more than

doubling your chances of finding the one. Of course, if you’re focused on just one girl, and only one,

write a very lengthy message.

For girls contacting guys, it’s actually a bit different of a graph:

The shorter the message, the better. Period. You can write about 11.4 messages per hour if they’re 50

characters. This will give you 3.43 conversations per hour. So yes, in both instances, you want to write

shorter messages for the best chance of success.

Now exactly what you should write … well, that’s a subject for another blog post, although you should use

“pretty” over “beautiful,” use proper English, and say “zombie” in your messages. Yes, I am serious, though

I can’t figure out in what context that would work in the first place.

Casual Relationships, Adult Dating – what’s the difference?

Friday, September 11th, 2009

sexy-black-lingerie-wallpapers_9212_1680x1050Well the answer is not that much. I suppose a casual relationship is the nice auntie to the pervy adult dating uncle.

Ultimately they are both up to the same thing – having relationships, having sex, meeting people, seeing them for a while, not seeing them anymore, seeing someone new, ad infinitum, usque ad mortem. And so on.

The major difference here is approach, how it’s represented to the outside world – if at all – and how you conduct yourself generally.

Having sex with many different partners, with no commitment to them,  is basically what it’s all about. How you go about that is dependent on what you as a person are comfortable with. In my experience it often comes down to confidence and a little modesty. If you act, talk and look like a painted lady, then as sure as eggs is eggs, you will labelled as one. Have a dynamic, interesting, positive front and you will be assigned a different status, holding par with the great and good of the dating world.

The perception of adult dating has changed a lot in recent times,  and it is broadening into mainstream culture, where it is accepted more than ever, that sleeping with many different partners over the course of your life is the norm. Not since ancient Greece have we enjoyed such sexual liberalism. As such, and with a little nous, the dating world really can be your oyster.

One main hurdle to hooking up however, can be the opportunity to hook up itself. Well, fear not, as there’s many an opportunity  in the brave new world of the internet. You’re only one click away from finding out what it’s all about.

Still undecided about what adult dating is all about? Here’s an article from the folks over at Berkley.edu to enlighten you some more.

Online dating has shed its stigma as matchmaker for the awkward (Goodwin 1990) to claim a new prominence in the social lives of millions of users. In August 2003 alone, 40 million unique users visited online dating sites in the United States alone, according to U.S. News & World Report — that’s about half the number of single adults in the U.S. Given their prevalence, it seems likely that online dating systems have begun to influence not only individual lives but also cultural notions of love and attraction with their overflowing catalogues of potential partners and their sometimes idiosyncratic choices of personal characteristics to highlight. But despite the incredible number of people using these services, we know little about how users perceive each other and interact through these mediated channels, or how such technologies might affect their selection of partners for dating, sex, and marriage.

Online adult dating.